Some in the environmental movement believe that sabotaging fossil fuel infrastructure to limit harm to the planet is justified, especially given the lack of action from governments. This includes efforts to destroy machinery, property, and other facilities that facilitate the burning of fossil fuels. They argue that if your home was on fire, you would be justified in doing whatever you could to put the fire out. People have been caught and sent to prison for committing climate sabotage. Beyond danger and risks involved, some believe that using tactics like this in the name of environmentalism weakens the entire movement, making change through policy and public opinion more difficult. Yet supporters of climate sabotage often counter that from the Suffragettes to the Civil Rights movement, having a more radical wing has often helped wider movements push politicians to make concessions.

The player with the most Dirty Energy tokens loses 2 Dirty Energy tokens.

Then they immediately check if they can meet Energy Demand, and they must add Communities in Crisis equal to the Energy Demand gap.

If this Crisis was face up during the Local stage and players tucked Society tags under it, this effect can be reduced by 1 for each card tucked under this card.

• The moral case for destroying fossil fuel infrastructure by Andreas Malm (The Guardian) 

• Should Environmental Activists Sabotage Fossil Fuel Infrastructure? (The Nation)

• 📕 How to Blow Up a Pipeline by Andreas Malm

• Organize a group screening of “How to Blow Up a Pipeline”

• Start discussions with your family and friends exploring fossil fuel sabotage.